Ex-Gay Watch seeks writers to critically analyze the following recent NARTH antigay propaganda items:
While the items obviously fixate upon, and exaggerate, prurient and kinky aspects of small subcultures within the scope of same-sex-attracted individuals, we’re looking for analysis that goes beyond that. How are NARTH’s demographic samples rigged? What clinical and political biases can be documented? To whom is this information marketed? By whom was the data vetted for accuracy and scope? What revenues are earned on the syndication of such propaganda? Is NARTH retaliating against opposing claims that were also rigged?