This is a follow-up in our effort to separate fact from fiction in the alleged assault claimed by Parents and Friends of ExGays and Gays (PFOX) at the Arlington County Fair last month. If you haven’t read our earlier coverage, please do so first to help put the following in context. You can find what could be referred to as parts one and two in our archives, along with this related article.
When we last reported on this issue September 5, the Arlington County Police Department, representatives from the Arlington Fair, an Arlington County Board Member and two eyewitnesses all reported having no idea what PFOX was talking about when they claimed an assault had taken place at the Arlington County Fair on August 18. One thing has changed since that time.
On September 10, we received the following email from John Lisle, our contact at the ACPD. It was our original inquiry to him that started their investigation into the matter and we asked that he let us know if any new information turned up. This was also posted to the original thread by a commenter about an hour after we received it.
One officer told me today he was on patrol at the Fair when a woman approached him and told him a man had knocked over pamphlets at the PFOX booth and assaulted another man there.
The officer then spoke to the alleged victim. He did not want to press charges and therefore no written report was filed.
Based on the description the officer was given, he located the suspect at the Fair. Another officer escorted that gentleman off the Fair grounds.
This was quite exciting, as up to now we were coming up dry everywhere. Contrary to the way it has been framed by some, this obviously isn’t proof of an assault — even the police have no witnesses — but it is something. Clearly the PFOX workers had talked with the officers and we were able to exchange questions with them through Lisle over the next week or so.
We first verified the place and time. Whatever it was, it did in fact occur at approximately 5:00 PM ET, Saturday, August 18, at the PFOX booth located inside the indoor section of the Arlington County Fair. One can get a general idea of how the booths were arranged by the photograph to the left, however we were told that it was more crowded Saturday evening than in this photograph. This was also the time frame during which two witnesses told us they saw what they called a “heated discussion” at the PFOX booth (but no assault or literature thrown).
When questioned by the police, the alleged attacker denied hitting anyone but admitted that “his emotions got the best of him.” So while he could be lying, he could also be truthfully admitting to the “heated argument” that others have reported. Either way, we still have no one from a crowded, indoor location who saw a physical assault or literature being thrown to the floor — at least no one other than those at the PFOX table.
The police asked him to leave based on their belief that he was at the very least involved in some sort of disturbance, as even he admitted to becoming overly emotional. Since they saw nothing themselves, and the alleged victim did not press charges, no other action was taken. Currently, the police do not know the name of the alleged attacker, and they have no witnesses other than the two PFOX workers. If they had seen an attack themselves, they could have arrested the attacker whether the victim pressed charges or not.
In the mean time, PFOX found a sympathetic ear in Matt Barber, a Concerned Woman for America attorney and writer. In a web audio interview, PFOX executive director Regina Griggs and someone claiming to be the alleged victim, “David,” basically told the same story as before, while Barber read the email above from Lisle as “proof-positive that this occurred.” Again, it is certainly germane, but it is not proof of anything beyond the fact that someone from PFOX relayed this story to the police that evening, and based on that they asked someone to leave. As an attorney, Matt Barber of all people should understand the difference.
There were some other issues brought out in this interview. David describes the alleged attacker as “belligerent,” yet in the next breath says he invited him out to his car, away from the booth, to retrieve his Bible — not a smart move for someone he considered so threatening. Also, Griggs stated a couple of times that she was the woman at the booth with David, yet both our witnesses have identified Estella Salvatierra — a longtime PFOX vice president and moderator, who is a civil rights attorney for the FCC in Washington — as the woman there during the incident, and after. While we don’t currently have a photo of Griggs, there are at least 20 years and any number of physical differences between her and Salvatierra.
We don’t yet know why it would matter, but the evidence suggests that Griggs was not there and Salvatierra was, yet Griggs is saying otherwise. Lisle has also said that during her conversations with him, Griggs has never spoken as though she was present at the booth during the incident, as she does in the audio interview and other places. Again, we don’t yet know the significance of this, but she clearly can’t speak about events in the first person if she was not there at the time.
One additional clue to who was actually there is found in audio from the CWFA interview. In this short clip, you will hear David explaining part of the argument. He says about the alleged attacker, “then he… I think Est–, the other volunteer mentioned about …” It’s brief, but definitely there and when taken together with the other facts one can make a strong case that it was Estella Salvatierra in the booth next to David during the incident, and not Regina Griggs. The importance of this and why it is being hidden may become apparent at a later date.
Another interesting item is an observation by one of the witnesses we talked with, Vania Villanueva at her insurance booth. She identified Salvatierra as the woman who was arguing most fiercely, described ironically as “belligerent” to us, while the man she was yelling at stayed almost silent. We aren’t certain what to make of this either, but it is one more curious bit of information to add to the puzzle. Those who have been around Salvatierra tell us that she can be rather loud and imposing, even when not arguing.
To date we have received no reply from Griggs, in spite of the fact that no less than Exodus president Alan Chambers has repeatedly asked her to call us. I personally called Salvatierra, but aside from very loudly demanding to know where we were getting our information, she refused to discuss the matter. It would have helped our investigation significantly if we had been able to discuss this directly, but the people at PFOX continue to be extremely secretive.
Last week we received a call from Arlington County Fair Association chairman Shawn Kelley. Kelley is a retired Chief Fire Marshal with 27 years of public safety service in Arlington County. He said he had received no information to indicate that an assault actually took place, and so as far as he was concerned it had not. To our knowledge, no one else has changed their position on this matter, nor have they been able to find anyone who can attest to it having happened.
We would like to be more conclusive, but we hope that the reader can review the facts and the open questions, and come to some conclusions for themselves. While one can hardly take them seriously, the extreme right-wing tabloid World Net Daily created a story on this today, continuing to elevate the report of PFOX to the officers as if the officers had seen it.
It has been exceptionally difficult to cut through the misinformation to approach the truth in this matter, but once we started we thought it necessary to follow through. It should go without saying that no one should ever be assaulted over a debate of issues, nor should anyone be allowed to use an accusation of assault to falsely martyr a cause. Our concerns about the possibility of either have led us to investigate the Arlington incident intensely and responsibly. If something new should surface, we will report it.
PFOX Brochures: In case anyone would like to know what PFOX claims the world is “hungry for,” these are downloadable versions of the literature on their tables.
I glanced at the brochure articles… mroe of the same. But this caught my attention!
Human Rights Campaign of hate against heterosexuals
Lol… once you open it the title changes to ex-gay but WHO CARES… right? -_-
This is so typical of extremist Evangelicals. They use fear and hate to get money and attention – followers; and then when they feel threatened by the people whom they are teaching hatred toward they play the victim card. I’ve seen this situation across the board with these people, not just on the gay issue but several other issues as well. They thrive on mythology. If enough people believe it then it must be true right? The more dramatic the perceived persecution of these folks the more believable their message is. If it’s true then their message must be true and therefore you need to believe them and believe that homosexuality is a shameful “lifestyle” and you must repent of it and change to become what their interpretation of the Bible says you should be. You should either change to become heterosexual and get married or live a single life for the rest of your days.
These folks think that even lying for God is justifiable (Regina Griggs not really being there but saying she was) because the end justifies the means. Pretty pathetic and very telling of their M.O.
Now if you could just get the guy who was “escorted” from the fair by the police…. and hear his version.
Or to put it another way….
MetroWeekly may have a little more news on the story at:
https://www.metroweekly.com/gauge/?ak=2978
Jeepers, I can only see David’s hands… most of him has vanished under a big steaming pile of horse do. Such is the life of an investigative reporter… (snorkle on the way, DHL)
Do, errm, police in that place bother to ask questions before acting? If no, I’ve got a few names of alleged criminals I’d like to pass on to them. But I digress.
No doubt you are seeking to find this guy who was (reported to have been) kicked out:
Let me guess.. he was “medium/average height, Caucasian or possibly Hispanic, brownish hair, possibly wearing a blue “Gap” windcheater or similar and jeans, no distinguishing marks or tattoos, last seen near the hotdog stand”…
Yeah, I think I know him.
(come to think of it, that could be Greg Quinlan. Anyone asked him where he was that day?)
PS: (hope you can hear us) good job, and keep going. And breathing 🙂
I’m feeling in my water that the “big steaming pile of horse do” does have a birth name…
You’re digging yourself a bigger and bigger hole, David. Do you need a new shovel? The hypocrisy of the three of you — ExGayWatch, Jim Burroway and Wayne Besen — is grand. Just imagine the outrcry and shrieking press releases that would be flying had Wayne Besen or Jim or you been hit on the back by an angry, right-wing Christian while you were out passing your materials at a fair! Calls for a hate crime investigation and much more, to be sure. And yet none of you can humble yourself and admit that you were simply wrong for saying and/or implying that this assault on David — who tried to turn the other cheek — never even happened. Wow. As a pro-family conservative deeply skeptical of each of your guys’ websites, I am stunned at your double-standard.
PS. Jay Fisette’s PFOX-bashing “retraction” in Metro Weekly was equally pathetic.
David,
excellent follow-up. Perhaps if Griggs knows we’ll call her on her crap she’ll stop lying through her teeth.
Peter,
What you forget is that while XGW will present all the facts, including those that may lend support to PFOX’s claims, Griggs, WND, and other anti-gays WILL NOT present all the facts.
So if you ask me who to believe… well, that’s pretty easy. I believe the folks who are laying everything on the table.
But, then again, your history suggests to me that your affection for honesty and accuracy is far less than your desire to wage culture war, Peter. I know that when I read something on your website it is NEVER the full story.
You bring up a good point, though not the one you intended. PFOX’s report to the officers that night described the alleged assault as a “push or a shove” and yet David said “he took his hand and went boom in my back.” This is another inconsistency, among many. He went on to say that it didn’t hurt, and that he thought that was “just is way of communicating.”
Does any of this make sense? PFOX is not known for “turning the other cheek” so could there be another reason one would not want to go on record and swear to this story under oath?
Peter, even your allies are embarrassed by you. We’ve just doubled your traffic for the day by allowing you to link here, consider it a gift.
For the record, Arlington County Board Member Jay Fisette’s statement, which was alluded to above, was made on 9/6:
Until 9/10, this is exactly what the police told everyone. And as far as we know at the moment, the first sentence could still be true. And the witnesses in our stories have all concurred that the PFOX booth did not receive much traffic, and most people they observed left immediatly after discovering what they were about.
Fisette has no need to make a retraction – he said exactly what was known at the time. His comments in the Metro Weekly explain this.
Police: a push or a shove
PFOX’s David: he hit me hard (per Janet Folger’s WND article)
Someone’s telling a fib. Gee, can I guess who?
Pete,
I frequent several gay websites and every time your name is brought up (“Le Bab’s”, “Porno Pete”) it’s always out of what a joke you are.
Your antic’s are ridiculous and much of what you say borders on the wacky. Do us all a favor and throw away your stacks of old gay porn you have accumulated over the years (research?), stop visiting gay bathouses (research again?) and spend more time with your wife and children, I’m sure they have missed you.
Oh boy, David, more conspiracies, coupled with some insults headed my way. Great response.
C’mon, Tim, David’s whole “investigative reporter” thesis (schtick?) was that the event never occurred. When Lisle came out with his statement, it completely undercut that, yet XGW (assuming this is David) acted as if this was only a small piece in the puzzle, and days passed untill a new thread went up on your site. (That should have been breaking news: correct me if I’m wrong on the dates.)
The reason information was so sparse in the first place is that the ex-gay guy (David) — you know, the victim here –was NOT vindictive and there wasn’t even a police report filed. BTW, Tim, if you were hit by a conservative wacko, I wouldn’t fault you for going big with it as evidence of antigay violence, etc.
Maybe this is Freudian on David’s part: we all know — gay and pro-family — that there are plenty of actual FAKE “hate crimes” to research, but they’re perpetrated by GAY activists (and fake racial victims), not ex-gay volunteers for underfunded pro-family groups.
“The reason information was so sparse in the first place is that the ex-gay guy (David) — you know, the victim here –was NOT vindictive and there wasn’t even a police report filed.”
So instead of not wanting to make a police issue of it, this was used by PFOX as a weapon against all gay activists and an attempt to make all ex-gays into martyrs.
Peter, I hope you realize that your boorish responses in this thread, most of all your attempts to turn this into being about anything but the incident itself, have done much more to hurt your cause than any of XGW’s writing on the subject ever could.
Conspiracies? Who even hinted at conspiracies?
Well, let’s see. Unlike you Pete, I don’t do this for a living and I don’t solicit handouts from others to pay my way – I work during the week. So I don’t have all the time in the world to post daily. Secondly, we try not to post bits and pieces – we went back and exchanged emails with Mr. Lisle all that week and I got my last responses from him yesterday morning. I also had to wait for some photos of Estella as the descriptions from all the people we spoke with were matching her and not Regina, yet Regina was telling everyone that she was the one there in the booth with David. I got the final response from those identifications the day before yesterday.
In point of fact, the email you mentioned was posted in it’s entirety by a commenter in our PFOX thread about an hour after we received it. While it didn’t say much, we certainly didn’t censor it — it’s still there now, childish insults and all. This, in spite of the fact that the commenter was not supposed to post again until supporting or retracting some earlier bizarre statements (we are kinda sticklers for the facts). This is the same commenter who admitted himself that PFOX censored his questions to their Yahoo group, and only allowed his post concerning this email to get through — that’s what you call a double-standard.
I’m sorry that I couldn’t get all that accomplished sooner, but we’ve posted the facts as we find them. In contrast, when you recently stumbled on to a genuine issue (Brian Wyant and the GayStraightAlliance.org site), you seemed satisfied to lob a few dismissive comments and leave it at that. We had to do the real work and, even though we ended up being very critical of a pro-gay organization, we went to great lengths to find the truth and expose it. Oh, and we also got the problem resolved and we continue to monitor it.
That’s what we mean by investigative reporting. What do you mean?
Peter LaBarbera,
Make this really easy for everyone: just say what you think happened.
That way we will, at least, know what didn’t happen.
ps. you should never invite anyone with “correct me if I’m wrong”. Frankly, nobody has that much time to reply to you.
Hey, LaBabs! I can’t believe you’re gracing our presence! I figured you’d have better things to do, like “research” a leatherman porn convention.
You know, BTB has an award named after you. Love it.
Peter, most of us, if not all, believe that violence against a member of any community for the sake of hatred is wrong. The reporting on the website did not really suggest who did what–it was a presentation of the info provided. Also, EGW did put up info, did not hide it.
However, your suggestion that the slightest altercation on a gay person would bring on calls of hate crime is faulty. You also imply that we often have fake hate crimes. I know of very few cases that are such, but you suggest it is common.
Many of us have said we figure something happened at the event, but the question is how exaggerated is it. The officials and law tend to think very little about it overall. I am not a supporter of hate crime laws for a variety of reasons, but if a case of hate crime happened, yes that should be investigated whether gay or exgay.
From WorldNetDaily:
This is so funny–comparing homosexuality to a cult (when often exgay groups use cult techniques). I feel bad because I do not have the network described. I guess people don’t care if I remain gay 🙁
LOL This is not exactly something I imagine when someone says they were attacked. This is the funniest line in the article. It is a line children use on the playground when they get in a fight. I am sorry if I am insensitive here, but it is not that convincing of a line. Maybe it is out of context, but it is hardly a hate crime type of line.
Let me guess.. he was “medium/average height, Caucasian or possibly Hispanic, brownish hair, possibly wearing a blue “Gap” windcheater or similar and jeans…
…driving a white van with a ladder rack…
Peter,
I really don’t mind you shortening my name to “Tim”. However, I’d think you’d be the last person interested in encouraging the use of nicknames. 😉
As for if a conservative wacko hit me, yeah I’d probably report it.
What I would NOT do, however, is escalate a push into a hit in the back (hard). Nor would I remain anonymous and make my accusations through someone else. Nor would I allow others to lie about who was or was not there. Nor would I claim that having someone else tell my story to the police – the way they want to tell it – is the same thing as the police verifying my story.
You see, Peter, I’m not a liar. Nor am I fond of spinning stories.
I have opinions and I have bias. But I try to tell the truth – even when it doesn’t fit my agenda. I want people to judge situations based on the facts, not just those that I think will give me advantage.
I do believe, Peter, that if you asked yourself – away from the public fray, when you are alone with just yourself and God – whether you always tell the full truth, that you would have to admit – at least to yourself – that you do not. You would have to acknowledge that everything that you say and do is slanted to give a specific impression regardless of facts or reality.
And that is what separates me from you and Regina Griggs.
The reason information was so sparse in the first place is that the ex-gay guy (David) — you know, the victim here –was NOT vindictive…
Actually, information wasn’t very sparse at all initially. You guys were throwing out a lot of information. The problem was it just wasn’t adding up.
Okay…the amount of verifiably Factual information was very sparse…yeah. Matter of fact, it still is. Funny thing…that.
Nice. 8)
Was what I said insulting Pete? What is insulting was how you exploited the death of Russell Groff to feed this unhealthy obsession of yours. THAT is what is insulting.
So you wouldn’t “fault” a gay activist for “going big with…evidence of antigay violence,” you would just fault them for perpetrating an “actual FAKE “hate crime?””
Do go on…
Peter also has some secret knowledge of plenty of actual “fake racial victims.”
Hmm.
I was wondering if anyone would pick that up.
lots of fake hate crimes? I rather doubt that, and if so, please give evidence that such is the case.
there is more indication that hate crimes, esp. against gays, are under-reported. but bottom line, reporting a “fake crime” to the police is illegal and i think individuals, gay or otherwise, usually hesitate before doing that.
that being said it now occurs to me that that is one reason no police report was filed in this case. not Christian charity but fear of the consequences of filing a false or exagerated police report.