(Updated 07/22/11 — scroll down)
Seattle preacher Mark Driscoll has provided some “some backstory” on — though not apologized for — his “flippant comment” about effeminate worship leaders, saying it arose from a conversation with a trucker, and his executive elders have since told him he needs to “do better by hitting real issues with real content in a real context.”
Yesterday, we reported Driscoll’s vicious Facebook post, in which he essentially asked his followers to expose and ridicule effeminate worship leaders:
So, what stories do you have about the most effeminate anatomically male worship leaders you’ve ever personally witnessed?
After hearing about this hideously sophomoric behavior, I sent an email to Mars Hill Church, where Driscoll is pastor:
Millions of kids in schools across the world are bullied every single day because their peers perceive them as effeminate, gay, less than masculine. Many of them suffer such humiliation, they’d rather kill themselves. I don’t think you can have missed that, as several high-profile bullying-related suicides have been reported in the US over the last couple years.
I sent him this quote, from a straight, married Christian who knows what it is to be hurt by such remarks:
When you put out a call on Facebook for people [to] verbally attack “effeminate anatomically male” men, I find myself back in high school—shoved against a locker, with the bullies calling me a faggot.
I added:
Please don’t add to the pain by encouraging Christians to expose and mock “effeminate anatomically male worship leaders.”
Driscoll: No Apology
Driscoll’s response to the public debacle so far has been not to apologize but to miss the point completely. A “raging debate on gender and related issues” ensued, he wrote. But it would be more accurate to say a protest against his mean-spirited, bullying behavior ensued. This isn’t primarily about gender; it’s about bullying.
Driscoll says the Facebook comment stemmed from a chat with a trucker who was “uncomfortable” with effeminate worship leaders. A shrewder pastor might have pointed out that anyone comfortable in their own skin need not feel uncomfortable around people who are different, and perhaps the trucker should be more confident in his own identity and worry less about that of others. But rather than address this insecurity, Driscoll responded with the very kind of macho posturing for which he is renowned:
He asked some questions about the Bible, and whether the Bible said anything about the kind of guy who should do the music. I explained the main guy doing the music in the Bible was David, who was a warrior king who started killing people as a boy and who was also a songwriter and musician.
Yes, he affirmed this hostility towards effeminate men by explaining that a boy who kills people is pretty much God’s ideal role model for the perfect, alpha male worship leader.
So, what of Driscoll’s juvenile attempt to rally his Facebook followers to a verbal lynching of men who fail to make the mark? He says it was flippant and it lacked context. This he blames on the limitations of social networking:
These are big, tough, far-reaching issues. Too big, tough, and far-reaching for things like Facebook and Twitter, I’ve recently learned. … In the past, I’ve not had a regular place to work out personal commentary on social issues, and so I’ve erred in sometimes doing so in places like Facebook, Twitter, and the media, where you can have a good fight but don’t have the room to make a good case.
Astounding. He really thinks — or at least wants his followers to think — his demeaning attack was a failure of social media. And he talks about being a real man? How about being man enough to take responsibility for your own choices and your own abusive words, Pastor Mark?
Hat-Tip to… Another Macho Pastor
Now, onto the hat-tip for this article. You know, that bit where I acknowledge where I first heard this story. It’s an interesting one.
It began yesterday with a comment from “Daniel” on the Driscoll post. Here it is in its entirety:
this is just gay
As with all first-time comments, it came to the moderation queue. I didn’t publish it, as it was flippant, unnecessary and a clear attempt to add to Driscoll’s bullying with a drive-by anti-gay slur. But I did check out the email address, which led me to Daniel Beckworth, a youth pastor at Union Grove Baptist Church, Opelika, Alabama. According to the Thomasville Times, he ministers to high school students as an evangelist with Youth for Christ, Auburn. He’s also CampusLife Director for the organization in East Alabama.
So I emailed Daniel and asked why he — a pastor charged with caring for young people — chose to add to Driscoll’s sophomoric bullying with a derogatory, homophobic, trolling comment of the very type that hurts kids that are “different” every day. I pointed out that many kids would rather kill themselves than face such humiliation. I kept it low-key and respectful, saying that “even if you have conservative beliefs about homosexuality, there are better ways to express them than ridiculing and stigmatizing.” He replied:
You really don’t have anything better to do? You’re going to spend the majority of your day criticizing a man who has actually accomplished much for the kingdom? Who are you and what have you done besides talk trash about someone else? Why don’t you go criticize the mrn who refuse to do anything or the people arent man enough to take a stand against homosexuality.
My comment was meant to show how rediculous your stupid website is. Youre wasting time blogging about that because you must have nothing better to do. It doesn’t help anyone and you become guilty of the something you accuse Driscoll of being.
I admit, I don’t have a megachurch. But I do consider the work I do here through Ex-Gay Watch a worthy cause, and I said so:
I have many things I’d rather be doing, but I consider standing up to bullies a noble cause. If you don’t think holding up effeminate males to exposure and ridicule is bullying behaviour, I’m not sure I can convince you. Maybe you need to speak directly to some of the young people whose lives are miserable because they’re bullied daily because, through no choice of their own, they don’t look or sound masculine enough.
A naive part of me hoped this youth pastor would come down a notch or two, think twice about what he was saying and start to show some sensitivity to these issues — real issues for millions of kids every day. His bizarre reply, however, seemed to pit bullying against pampering:
Maybe you should speak to the young boys who wish they had someone to help them be manly. You dont need to reply. You have no chance of convincing me that we need to pamper young boys.
I did reply. I told him the exchange had been illuminating and I intended to publish it. He laughed it off:
Oh no! If you publish our conversation the 14 people who read your website will know I disagree with you.
I’m not laughing. In fact, I’m fearful for the kind of men, gay or straight, who suffer humiliation and distress in churches like these because of the hostile atmosphere created by such brashly declared stereotypical notions of masculinity.
So here it is, for the record: evidence that there are pastors out there who think and talk exactly like Driscoll; pastors engaged in youth outreach who defend Driscoll and consider criticizing him on the same level as publicly rounding up your disciples for a gossip session about “the most effeminate anatomically male worship leaders you’ve personally witnessed.”
So, the hat-tip. H/T: Pastor Daniel Beckworth, who ended our exchange last night by sending me the link to the Driscoll article:
Read that homeboy and have a good night.
Addendum
John H points out that Daniel’s trolling comment echoed Mark Driscoll’s own words from 2006, when he ended a homophobic rant against Brian McLaren with the words “In conclusion, this is all just gay.”
Driscoll was forced to apologize for the ugly diatribe — there’s a pattern here — which was both dismissive and derisive of gays and lesbians:
Well, it seems that Brian McLaren and the Emergent crowd are emerging into homo-evangelicals. … I am myself a devoted heterosexual male lesbian who has been in a monogamous marriage with my high school sweetheart since I was 21 and personally know the pain of being a marginalized sexual minority as a male lesbian.
Driscoll legitimates “homo” and “gay” as terms of derision, and somewhere along the line, among the legions of loyal fans Driscoll has a lot of influence over, a youth pastor does the same. The similarity may or may not have been deliberate — but the behavior pattern is unmistakeable.
Update: 07/22/11
Daniel has emailed me with an apology, which it seems he has shared with a number of people this affects. In it he acknowledged that “many young people struggle with acceptance and face the terrors of bullying on a daily basis and it is not my desire to offend those young men or add to their struggles.” He ap0logized to me, his church, YFC and young people who have been bullied. He added that he’s realized his words “can have deep consequences and I can very easily belittle young men whose struggles I know nothing of.”
You never really know when people make mistakes so publicly like this how genuine their apologies are, but if all this has made Daniel even a fraction more sensitive to the issues involved here, and if that is reflected even in some small way in his youth ministry, so much the better.
Is this a call for people to carry on where George Rekers left off?
English isn’t his strong suit, is it.
Excellent post, Dave. It’s hard to overstate the damage Beckworth and others like him can cause. He has a horribly skewed view of what it is to be a man, and seems entirely clueless concerning the concept of bullying and what it does to a young person — or an adult for that matter. It’s amazing that someone like that would be entrusted with a youth group, but sadly this is very common.
If anyone needed a real-life illustration of how people like Driscoll negatively impact others, here it is. Parents, please think carefully before subjecting your kids to this sort of person.
And to Union Grove Baptist Church, you may want to make sure your liability insurance is paid up. Churches, especially youth groups, are supposed to be a safe place.
To steal a fb status update from my friend Jay Bakker:
“I hope for the day when everyone can speak again of God without embarrassment.” Paul Tillich
@Emily K
Driscoll clearly needs to preach a sermon on how real men can spell, use grammar and punctuate correctly. :-/
… just for the record, there are youth pastors out there that side with you on this, Dave. And we who side with you strive very hard to make our youth ministries a safe place for all people. I’m sorry people (pastors) like Dan fail to read and live out everything Jesus put forth.
UGH! It’s Christians like these who give Christianity a bad name. Pastor Daniel–take a look at how Jesus dealt with those who in his time were despised as the “other.” Did he ridicule, shame, or bully the woman at the well? The woman caught in adultery? Zacchaeus the tax-collector? Ridiculing? Shaming? Bullying? Yeah, ’cause THAT’S what Jesus would do! UGH!
@Shawn . Yup. Even when I was a conservative Pentecostal youth pastor, I wouldn’t have dreamed of encouraging those kinds of attitudes.
It appears Beckworth has already started the martyr response on Twitter:
Being criticized for your own bad behavior does nothing for the Kingdom, and only generates ridicule towards God. Really, Beckworth, if God can’t humble you, who can?
How immature.
Not “manly enough” to be transparent, Daniel? I thought not.
@David Roberts
At least you know now he’s following this discussion.
@John H
Real men don’t care about that sissy grammar stuff.
lol, Real Men(TM) cry “martyr” when they’re called out for less-than-flattering remarks.
BAWWWWWWW!!!
WOW!
Just wow…
My friends, despite the burly looks of fellows like Matt Barber, Peter LaB, Brian Brown and Driscoll.
Rather than accuse them of being closet cases, it’s better to describe them as the wussy wet pants they really are.
When challenged they complain of being threatened or their rights taken away.
When confronted with their hypocrisy, they plead they are being silenced. If being silenced were a fact, then how is it then have all the media’s attention on them and they are seen all over television and heard on broadcast media? They ARE invited to debates, but were they being silenced, they never WOULD be.
Men THIS disturbed by gay people, without being anywhere NEAR any they know of…reveal a such a LACK of any courage, even to LISTEN to a plea of protecting CHILDREN from bullies, then we are doing nothing TO them.
They demand every opportunity to make ASSES of themselves, and when WE give them opportunities NOT to, then they are too stupid to figure it out.
It’s not brave to demean or pick on someone you THINK is weaker than you are. Indeed, the teaching of Christ was just the opposite.
It’s morally ethical to empathize with those in difficulty, it’s wrong to mock them. Another teaching of Christ.
I’m down with Christ.
Driscoll…doesn’t like or care about Christ at ALL.
as morrissey said, it’s so easy to laugh and hate but takes guts and strength to be gentle and kind. i think these cases of arrested development with a juvenile fascination with violence and macho posturing are just projecting their insecure egos into their image of God.
One of the most disheartening things about Mark Driscoll for me, as a Christian, is discovering how many people agree with him. But one of the most encouraging things about Mark Driscoll for me is knowing that I’m not alone in recognizing the mindless destruction inherent in the words he chooses.
Thank you for writing this. It hurts that there are youth pastors out there who subscribe to Driscoll’s over-compensating machismo, even going so far as to invoking God and the bible in their own defense; just the same, it makes me feel warm inside to know there may yet be a generation of men who teach their sons to be okay with themselves. 🙂
Can I just say if I wanted an unambiguously hetero music leader figure from scripture, David might not be my first choice – given his love for Jonathan which exceeded his love for women and shamed Jonathan’s mother, not to mention their weepy, kissy goodbye scene… I happen to love the story, and I know most scholars don’t acknowledge the possibility of homo-eroticism in the story (surely Pastor Driscoll does not – or perhaps subliminally it appeals to him since he seems to have issues around sexuality). But the prominence of the love story within the narrative is remarkable and sexy and gay.
@Scott
No doubt Driscoll would be outraged by the suggestion of a homosexual dimension to the story of David and Jonathan. Yet he proudly holds up David’s reputation for violence and killing as a virtue. It’s a warped world some Christians inhabit.
@Dave Rattigan
Apparently, Pastor Beckworth managed to miss one of Jesus’ sayings: “If any of you put a stumbling-block before one of these little ones who believe in me, it would be better for you if a great millstone were hung around your neck and you were thrown into the sea” (Mark 9:42). It’s hard to imagine putting a bigger stumbling block before kids than encouraging the use of this kind of language. I hope he’s a good swimmer …
@Dave Rattigan
Driscoll seems to have forgotten that God wasn’t entirely happy about David’s violence. Quite apart from the whole Uriah thing, there’s the text where God tells David, via Nathan, that:
“You have shed much blood and have made great wars; you shall not build a house for my name, because you have shed much blood on the earth in my sight.”
That said, I’m not convinced by arguments that David and Jonathan had a sexual relationship – though, as Scott reminds us, Saul clearly thought they did (thus making them the first recorded victims of homophobic bullying…?).
The spin cycle is in full gear on all fronts. What is so amazing is how these so-called manly men are so paranoid. The man has a large, black-shirted security detail with earpieces walking the blocks surrounding his main campus on Sundays, where he ducks out the back door after the services so as not to press the flesh of the unwashed masses. The excuse given for church resources being used for this private security force are supposed threats from unknown and unnamed malcontents. It is just plain weird and creepy.
Mark Driscoll is a council member of The Gospel Coalition, an ultra-conservative movement to restore Christianity. From their website: “We are a fellowship of evangelical churches deeply committed to renewing our faith in the gospel of Christ and to reforming our ministry practices to conform fully to the Scriptures. We have become deeply concerned about some movements within traditional evangelicalism that seem to be diminishing the church’s life and leading us away from our historic beliefs and practices.”
John Piper and many other prominent conservatives were founders of this movement which started in recent years. Mark has been a part of it since early on and is a main leader and speaker.
I encourage people to write The Gospel Coalition to express concerns about Driscoll’s recent post. This is Driscoll’s leadership network and the other council members should be holding Driscoll accountable for his actions. Why is he is still speaking and leading with them while making these kinds of un-Christian remarks–especially when they claim to be “reforming our ministry practices to conform fully to the Scriptures.”
People like Driscoll can keep doing what they are doing precisely because they have these good ‘ol boy networks. I plan to write to them to challenge them to confront Driscoll instead of enabling him by continuing to give him a platform.
https://thegospelcoalition.org/about/council-members
Supremacist groups operate this way.
Women and gay folks are in for a world of hurt because of people influenced by him. He’s encouraging witch hunting and invasive entitlement where those two demographics are concerned. They are always the ones who suffer the most under such religious fervor.
And there never is much oversight in protecting the same from it.
@Karen
You’re right about “good ol’ boy networks.” Other examples are Piper giving a clean bill of health to Warren, and Mohler giving instant exoneration to Mahaney despite massive evidence to the contrary.
@David Roberts
And it would appear that his Twitter settings only allow his fawning sycophants to send Tweets to him…how pathetic.
This is so messed up! I am a worship leader in my church and have been accused of acting gay… As a youth at the time i couldn’t understand what everyone saw till a buddy of mine in confidence told me what type of things (stereo types) others saw in me. I change a few things that i saw in myself but made a great dicovery… It didnt matter because thats how God created me and the things that everyone saw were (stereo types) that man has made. I knew my heart and that it lined up with Gods word. Lol I dont care what others think of me as long as I give my whole heart over to him in worship. I cant help that He made me a sensitive guy, he did that so that in my worship i can be super sensitive to His leading…And Thanks to my buddy in highschool who took the time…not to bully me…but to help me and build me up, I take any comments like that and know that it has no effect on who I am. God has given me a beautiful family to lead and church that alows my to use my gifts…Can’t wait to help anyone gay or straight to met Jesus and then His Holy Spirit can deal with any sin in there life. Its time for the church to WAKE UP and learn to LOVE the sinner…hate only the sin… God is bigger than any stereo type or sin that my be in our lives… I God doesnt like Driscolls comment trust me in this…I wouldnt want to be in his shoes. Nothing said on this page or FB is going to change the heart of man…it is full of wickness! Only God can change the heart! And by the way…lol Just to add to the stereo type i became a Hairdresser and minister to my guest in ways i would have never thought possible! Would love for Driscoll to stop by my shop for a trim sometime!!! and yes i would still give him the best trim hes had while i pray for him!!!
In an interesting twist, Beckworth seems to have posted, then quickly pulled an apology from his personal blog on the 15th. That was barely a day after this post went up. I can’t say it really reflects an understanding of the problem or really any true remorse. He appears to apologize to everyone except those who would be most damaged by his remarks — gay youth.
You’ve got a long way to go, Daniel.
Beckworth seems to have given himself a nice pep talk which takes him off the hook, maybe that’s why he doesn’t need the apology now. In the “that”s been done before” department, he tweeted (yes, he has now unlocked them) on the 15th:
Gee, I wonder where he was going with that 🙂
Daniel, since I know you are reading, take this to heart. Your mistake was not making some stupid comments (which, be honest, you think and say all the time), those were just the symptom. Do something really brave and go find a LGBT organization, talk to them about your views and see how you may be contributing to the torment, or even death, of the youth you are allowed to influence.
And second, realize that Driscoll is one messed up guy who you can bet will be in the headlines one day for things you will not appreciate hearing about. The things you admire him for are the very things that are ugly in your own life. Don’t follow him.
If he’s blaming it on a facebook hack… sounds like a page out of a certain congressman’s book. Lack of integrity is a pretty big deal in my book…
Convenient that this apology came hours after I commented on the one he took down so quickly before. I can’t help but sense some manipulation from Daniel, but as Dave said, if this makes him think twice about the way he treats kids, that’s a good thing. The tweet about his Facebook “possibly being hacked” seems to tell the story about what he is trying to do, however.
And now his Twitter is locked again. If you want to be in ministry Daniel, you better learn to be more transparent — get over yourself.
Edit: added link to screen shot of Facebook “hack” tweet just to keep things honest.
This guy doesn’t get it. The REASON “gay” has become associated with “dumb, crappy, stupid,…” is because of its connotation with “homosexual.” People have a negative view of homosexuals and by proxy use the term “gay” to describe other things they view as unacceptable.