Paul Cameron of the Family Research Institute has been completely discredited. After being expelled from the American Psychological Association and condemned by resolution of the Nebraska Psychological Association and the American Sociological Association, it would seem logical that Cameron would not be quoted as a “source”.
Years of obviously inaccurate “studies” and debunked claims should suggest that those associated with Cameron have no regard for honesty. Even Exodus tries to not appear too closely linked to Cameron’s reports. But there are always some so hungry for a negative thing to say about gay people that they are willing to sell their integrity in order to push an agenda of hate.
One such person would seem to be Audrey Barrick, Christian Post reporter, who trumpets Cameron’s latest claims under the headline Survey: One-Third of Foster-Parent Molestations Homosexual. According to Cameron (via Barrick):
A tally from Illinois and Minnesota (2003-2005) showed that a third of foster-parent molestation perpetrators engaged in homosexuality with their charges – their own foster-children.
This “survey” is a regurgitation of Cameron’s year old claim that got the Texas Eagle Forum in hot water and was debunked in the Wall Street Journal.
This required several leaps of logic, some of which I’ll discuss later. The biggest is that Dr. Cameron had no data about the makeup of homes in which the Illinois children were abused; indeed, a state DCFS spokeswoman told me the agency doesn’t record whether households are same-sex. It’s possible that much of what Dr. Cameron calls homosexual abuse occurred in what would be considered heterosexual homes.
Nonetheless, Barrick dutifully reports
Family Research Institute pointed out that homosexuals comprise between 2 to 4 percent of adults, as studies reported, “thus the figures above indicate a disproportionate amount of homosexual molestation.”
and slides in the anti-gay agenda
“These 40 foster-parent molesters, given the limited official information about molestations of foster children, comprise one of the largest samples in the literature on this issue,” said Dr. Paul Cameron, chairman of the Family Research Institute, in a released statement. “And the evidence keeps on accumulating, indicating that those who engage in homosexuality are much more apt to sexually abuse their foster-children. Children are our most important possession; they must be protected form predators. One way to do that is to bar homosexuals from fostering or adopting children.”
For all Barrick knows, or Cameron for that matter, every single incident of molestation occurred in households of married individuals who attend church on Sunday and contribute to Focus on the Family. To claim that children can be “protected” by barring “homosexuals from fostering or adopting children” is nothing but a deception based on bias.
But Barrick is not alone in alone in her abdication of ethics in favor of homophobia. She’s joined this week by Bill Fancher, Fred Jackson, and Jody Brown of Agape Press in an article critical of the World AIDS Conference.
It is very difficult to locate the Agape in the opening comments from the three:
Pro-family advocates say the International AIDS Conference taking place in Toronto this week is a huge waste of time and money — as well as an opportunity for those in attendance to take a swipe at sexual abstinence as a way to combat the deadly disease.
In a world with tens of millions of cases of HIV infection, most of whom live impoverished and without any hope of treatment, the united efforts of nations, medical providers, and philanthropists who are joining together to fight this pandemic are written off by these three as “a huge waste of time and money”.
The reason? Because the Conference is not focused on preventing gay sex.
Using Paul Cameron as their source, Fancher, Jackson, and Brown show an amazing display of ignorance about the current face of AIDS in the world
He points out that billions of American dollars are spent trying to convince smokers to quit smoking — yet homosexuals are told researchers will do all they can to stem the spread of AIDS so that they can continue to have sex, the number-one cause of AIDS. Cameron feels there is no logic to such an approach.
Dr. Cameron has attended the International AIDS Conference before, but has been denied a booth to promote abstinence of homosexual sex as a preventive measure.
But would “abstinence of homosexual sex” have any impact on AIDS on a global scale? Not if you believe the information provided by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Worldwide, more than 90 percent of all adolescent and adult HIV infections have resulted from heterosexual intercourse.
If Cameron has indeed attended the International AIDS Conference before, he would know that vast majority of AIDS cases world wide are not gay men. And he would know that he’s doing nothing but sowing animosity and stirring up fear and hatred. Cameron again demonstrates his willingness to say anything no matter how untruthful or morally reprobate in his goal to demonize gay people and seek harm to their lives.
And Barrick, Fancher, Jackson, and Brown have shown themselves willing accomplices.
And Barrick, Fancher, Jackson, and Brown have shown themselves willing accomplices.
Joe adds:
As well as Exodus, Stephen Bennett, Deputy Sheriff Guy Admas, Stacy Harp, Matt Barber, James Dobson, Peter Lebarbera, DL Foster, Mark over at Chester street blog, Alan Keyes, William Bennett, Alan Chambers…..
THese are all people who have used or promoted works that reference Paul Cameron. Sad Stuff Folks!
and Rod Parsley, Robert Knight, Agape Press, Donald Wildmon, Voddie Bauchman
Don’t forget them either
This particular piece of Cameron nastiness was, if possible, even more obviously false than many others. He begins with the question:
“Do those who engage in homosexuality…”
But, of course, he has no idea if these abusive foster parents “engage in homosexuality”. Or boink goats for that matter.
In the only study that actually did ask the question, Jenny (1992?), men who were known to be homosexual — ie openly gay men etc — featured less often than their proportion in the population. Lesbians vanish off the scale.
And it ain’t just Paul Cameron that peddle this vile lie by manipulating the data in this way. NARTH do it as well, referencing a study that actually concludes conpletely the opposite.
(And despite Cameron’s imfamy, he remains referenced by the Exodus Youth site.)
It would help if I read, and noticed, the whole article! Jenny is not only mentioned, but also provides a wonderful quote:
Well now. That sure does account for a nasty question over at Yahoo! Answers. *sigh* People do listen. It’s appalling. A lie can run around the world before the truth’s even got a chance to get its shoes tied…
For a great, in-depth critique and analysis of the arguments made by Cameron et al on this issue, see this article on Jim Burroway’s Box Turtle Bulletin:
https://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/Articles/000,002.htm
Also, you can also check out this summary of the available research on page 2 of this document: https://www.thetaskforce.org/downloads/TalkingPointsonParenting.pdf
Jayelle – can you provide the link to the question on Yahoo! Answers to which you are referring? If they have misinformation up I’d like to address it with them. Thanks!
This is the standard script of the moonbat right. They ignore reality, history and science and instead promote fantastical notions that perpetuate ignorance about AIDS and other STDs.
Right-wing authoritarian groups like the “Family Research Institute” don’t care about facts. They care only about their own agenda and their bizzare fascination with gay sex. In one breath they say that homosexuals make up 2-4% of the population (based on what exactly?) yet they assert that this small group (really small, considering that a solid majority of gays aren’t foster parents) is responsible for 1/3 of the molestations in IL and MN. I would think that were this the case it would be very easy to identify and prosecute the molestors (gay or straight). Since the DCFS doesn’t even track the sexual orientation of foster parents, the 1/3 estimate seems even more unbelievable.
Now, as to the claim that gay sex is “the number-one cause of AIDS”. Well, last time I checked, the consensus of the medical and scientific communities was that AIDS is caused by the HIV virus, which is spread by the exchanging of body fluids. I also seem to recall that in Africa, where AIDS is rampant in many places, the overwhelming majority of AIDS infections were “caused” by heterosexual sex. The same is now true in the USA!
Hatred of homosexuals will always trump facts when it comes to the moonbats. No amount of facutal evidence would ever cause them to stop their promoting hatred against us. How sad it is that propagandists like Cameron, Barrick, etc. never seem to get what they so clearly deserve.
The Southern Voice had an article on the conference. The leaders in HIV/AIDS prevention also said that the focus on abstinence only programs would be ineffective against women in desperate social situations where there is no sexual negotiation or equity, or for gay youth who don’t have the option to marry.
Unmarried young people, they say are at unnecessary risks and celibacy, after already having an active sex life isn’t an option.
They called it ‘secondary virginity’.
As for Cameron’s bogus gay foster parent ‘research’.
If the agencies that placed these children didn’t qualify the home according to the orientation of the parents, THEY have no records of the individual or couples being gay.
So how would Cameron put those numbers together?
I can only conclude, that Cameron considers placing children in the homes of gay people is itself abuse…and that’s where he gets his numbers.
So all he had to do was ask if the parents were gay and they had children in the home they cared for and boom: gay parents=abuse.
As you all know, even the Pope opined that adoption by gay parents was ‘doing violence to children’.
You all have any doubts that Paul Cameron and who he represents concur?
If this is how he’s played his research, than he’s placed children desperately in need of homes (who he doesn’t want either), in danger of NEVER having a home and more likely to remain in places where they REALLY are abused.
There must also be special care heeded that GAY kids be placed with parents who won’t abuse them for being gay.
Especially NOT religious parents who will emotionally and mentally abuse them.
These tend to be the very homes they are thrown or run away from.
All these people mentioned here DO reference either Cameron, Satinover or Nicolosi in their work.
So does Chad Thompson for that matter.
And because of that, I already know these people are full of it.
It shouldn’t be a surprise that the religious right references Cameron. They are always looking for some scientific veneer to provide a smokescreen for their religiously homphobic agenda.
And, given the fact that there ARE no legitimate scientific sources for homophobic policymaking, they have no choice but to invent or reference these hucksters and snake-oil salesmen.
The question was “resolved” last night. But he referenced an article that used Cameron’s “research.” I got a last lick in by bringing up Lou Beres in a comment.
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=ArslWLamSHXAVNNAINHCNejsy6IX?qid=20060815065710AAtvjE7
I’m *sure* it’ll be coming up again.
Regan,
“I can only conclude, that Cameron considers placing children in the homes of gay people is itself abuse…and that’s where he gets his numbers.”
Cameron get’s his numbers thusly:
“Devoted husband and family man” diddles the two little girls and one little boy in his foster care.
The state reports:
2 – man on female child
1 – man on male child
Ta-da!! Cameron declares that 1/3 of molestation was homosexual molestation. And since gay people are only a few percent of the populace, homosexual molestation is way out of purportion.
The solution? Foster care should not be allowed for gay people; it should be reserved for the devoted husband and family man!
And the cycle goes on.
But Cameron doesn’t care one whit if his proposed policies would lead to more children being molested. That’s just not important to him. All he cares about is that he gets to hate gay people and lie about them while sounding convincing to those who don’t know better.
Wow, that Yahoo answers thing is dangerous. People actually take answers from any tom, Ralph and Harry with a screen name? Your kidding. That is crazy. I hadn’t seen that before. Some of those people have dozens of answers they have posted on many subjects. This can’t be good for anyone. Somtimes, stuff just blows me away. How did I never see this stupidity before? OMG….there are wars in the world, starving kids, and this is what we do with our time? SIt and Yahoo and answer questions we don’t really know “boo” about? I am shocked…..Oh wait, the religious right answer questions about stuff they don’t know “boo” about all day long and get paid for it! I gotta get into this…..
(sorry, I know that was out of my normal charector, but it had to be done)
Tara’s Cameron rules:
1. People are more easily suckered by crap with numbers in it than by garden-variety crap.
2. If you hear a “statistic” about gays that sounds too horrific to be true, it is – and it came from Cameron.
3. If someone uses Cameron as a source, they’re either too gullible or too dishonest to be a valid source.
Joe, I resemble that remark.
I gotta do something in between NASCAR races.
“OMG….there are wars in the world, starving kids, and this is what we do with our time? SIt and Yahoo and answer questions we don’t really know “boo” about?”
Hey, you don’t know boo like I know boo, buddy!
If people like Cathie Adams want to make such loose assumptions from this Illinois study to imply gays are 11 times more likely to molest they have to equally entertain the loose assumption that the study represents the national ratio of gays to straights in the general population.
There were 270 reports, and 34% of those were same-sex in nature. Paul Cameron contends that those who commit same-sex child abuse are gay, regardless of whether they identify themselves as “homosexuals”. That being the case then its just as likely that if 34% of foster parents are gay then 34% of the larger population is gay – only 1 to 3% is being truthful about it. Does Paul Cameron et al think 1/3 of married apparently heteorsexual population is unfit to be married and have children because they’re secretly gay? Given Cathie Adam’s logic that’s just as likely an assumption as the idea gays are 11 times more likely to molest.
Maybe these studies really do show 34% of the apparently heterosexual general population is secretly open to gay sex given the right circumstances.
Should have remembered to put this up again, I guess.
If you’re interested, you can predict the overall ratios of molestation by sex using this spreadsheet. It’s based on Groth’s “Fixated” and “Regressed” categories for molestors, and a two other variables: basically 1) underlying adult sexuality and 2) opportunity.
I’ve included 2 environments: the general population, and that applying around RC priests. Both predict ratios that are (roughly) generally accepted as having been observed.
If you want to try some of your own numbers, type into the green cells, and watch the calculated ratios in the red cell.
Bottom line: it’s the “fixated” category that overwhelms the other categories of “gay” “bi” and “straight”. ie it’s the paedophiles who predictably molest children, not those with any adult sexual orientation.
(the FBI uses 7 “types”, but I am NOT writing that spreadsheet up for you guys!)
It bears noting that when presumed heterosexual men (whether they have children in their own homes or not) assault or abuse boys, it’s sometimes sexual assault with an OBJECT.
It’s another way of asserting power and fear over a boy. Straight males will do that with boys (or other men )they think are weak, or who they can get away with such behavior with.
I’m hearing lots of stories in the news about male assaults on girls.
That pencil necked creep who is suspected of killing JonBenet Ramsey has a long and storied history of messing with girls. Even coercing one to marry him when she was twelve.
A man in Georgia was recently indicted for the sexual abuse of his three biological daughters.
He’d videotaped himself having sex with them at various times, and he posted it on the Net for other consumers of kiddie porn.
Why, why, why…aren’t there competence and mental hygiene screenings for heterosexuals that there are for prospective adoptive and foster parents?
It’s a sick assed world when ONLY gay males are suspect regardless of the record that straight males have.
The story about the father was in the Atlanta Journal Courier-avoid unless you have a strong stomach.
To Joe Brummer,
Your slam against all participants of Yahoo Answers was off-topic and insulting to those Yahoo Answers participants who are knowledgeable. Since when are you helping to feed starving kids, and how do you know that Yahoo Answers participants aren’t? (Don’t answer that and take this discussion further off-topic. Just know that you have been warned.)