The Montgomery County, Maryland, Board of Education will limit a reconstituted sex-education committee to an advisory role in planning a new sex-ed curriculum, according to The Washington Blade.
The antigay parents and spouses group PFOX and the abstinence-only group Citizens for a Responsible Curriculum will each have one representative on the sex-ed advisory committee. PFOX had sought to nominate national antigay activist Peter Sprigg of the Family Research Council as its representative. The organizations’ literature claims that homosexuality is caused by bad fathering, modern gender roles, and molestation.
The Blade article quotes supporters of PFOX and CRC:
Rockville, Md., antigay doctor Ruth M. Jacobs equates same-gender attraction with “rectal sex.”
Antigay parent Samara Mendoza views ineffective reparative therapies as “principled positions” worthy of inclusion in secondary-school curricula.
Several antigay parents claim that the mere recognition of different types of families somehow marginalizes “traditional families.”
Oh yes rectal sex…I had better send a BIG FAT ANGRY LESBIAN over to Dr. Ruth Jacobs to remind her that there is another Gay Lifestyle (c) she has overlooked.Anyway, back to the real World…Mike A. please, contact the “good” parents groups off-line and let them know they have a resource they can ask for help. We’re not being subsidised by Focus on the Family, but at least we do know what we’re talking about.(If they had asked us — as example — we’d have rapidly culled the religous doo-doo that they tripped on last time.)
Is this ‘rectal’ sex thing something different from the ‘anal’ sex thing that evangelical Christians focus on? If not, then why introduce a new term? It seems to my admittedly unsophisticated mind that ‘anus’ and ‘rectum’ are more or less the same thing. Maybe, this is a chance to make two attacks on one issue.
“Two Attacks on One Issue” — I think I saw that video. Maybe not.As for the confusion, perhaps email Earle Fox and ask for his opinion. He has made rectal, um, anal, um, jeez, I don’t know — email and ask him. I suspect he has autistic tendencies on the subject, so ask for any elaboration you care to. He considers himself an expert.
Dalea:
I first encounted the term “rectal” sex in Dr. Cameron’s brochure, “Medical Consequences of What Homosexuals Do”, available on websites everywhere.
The way he uses the term, it appears that he considers it more graphic, shocking or “icky” than just saying “anal sex”. That’s just my guess.
One of us, shall remain unspecified, has just reminded the other of a mildly amusing story…Many, many years ago — and for reasons I cannot even fathom as to why the subject came up in conversation — a girl-Friend mention she enjoyed her peritoneum being stroked. Archly, I asked how her boyfriend managed to do this; what with her obviously still being alive and all.”Oh. You mean your perineum…”Doesn’t seem all that funny now I’ve written it, but all our medical friends seem to enjoy it.
grantdale,
I would contact Earle Fox but I just don’t have the time. Apparantly I’m way behind on my consumption of fecal material for the year and really need to dedicate some hours to catching up.
“A study in the New England Journal of Medicine indicates that the average active homosexual male ingests the fecal material of 23 different men each year.”
/tic
Thanks for the link to his site. This guy cracks me up. He thinks 22% of gays are into fisting, 23% into golden showers, and 4% into scat. Maybe I’ve lived a sheltered life (ummm, no that’s not it) but I truly don’t know ANYONE into scat (or at least no one has ever admitted it to me) and though I know fisting or golden showers are not unknown, they certainly aren’t practiced regularly by 1/4 of the guys I meet.