I share Natalie’s thoughts and prayers for Michael Johnston. It’s tough when I find myself acting contrary to my deeply held values and beliefs, and I can only imagine the same is true for him.
I need to point out a secondary issue, though. In speaking of Johnston, Peter LaBarbera notes:
Homosexual activists will surely charge that this latest falling “proves” that homosexuality (“sexual orientation”) cannot be changed, and that ex-“gay” ministry is a failure. Of course, such reasoning is fallacious, and is tantamount to asserting that Alcoholics Anonymous is a fraud because some of its adherents slip back into drinking.
Without getting into success and failure rates of either group (an intriguing topic, too much to address here), both groups fall short in promoting responsibility and harm reduction.
The simple truth is that we all slip up from time to time. We all fall short of our goals and contradict our values in some fashion.
AA would be an ideal place for folks to hear that they are responsible for exerting whatever control they can muster despite alcohol’s knack for impairing good judgement and common sense. In a worst case scenario during a slip-up, problem drinkers remain responsible for staying away from the wheel of a car.
Exgay ministries would be an ideal place to promote honesty and responsibility in worst case scenarios, as well. Michael Johnston had spoken publicly in the past about his remorse at exposing others to HIV without telling them. Apparently, based on quotes from a recent sexual partner of Johnston’s in Southern Voice, that pattern continued:
“What we did was unsafe,” said the man, who spoke only on condition of anonymity over fears that he would lose his job because of his sexual orientation or HIV status.
“I brought it up all the time, but [Johnston] didn’t seem to think it mattered,” the man said. “He would have these parties, get a hotel room, get online and invite tons of people – he just wouldn’t care.”
The man said he met Johnston, who he said called himself Sean, in a gay Internet chat room. They began meeting in the late fall of 2001, and their sexual relationship lasted about six months.
“It wasn’t all the time – he would just appear from time to time,” the man said. “But we were friends for a year and a half.”
“Sean” only revealed his HIV status at the end of the men’s friendship, claiming he had just found out, the man said. He learned Sean’s true identity from a friend who also dated him.
I accept that Johnston is a man of principle who has a conscience and feels remorse. I accept that the internal conflicts he experienced between his beliefs and actions contributed to his impaired judgement.
I just don’t accept that, as LaBarbera reports a Johnston family member saying, his primary failing was “trusting in himself, rather than God”. LaBarbera continues:
My friend preached the Gospel of Jesus Christ to millions, but he has now lost his public ministry and his reputation due to his actions. He caused pain for many others. These are the burdens he will have to carry for the rest of his life due to his selfish choices.
I’m not so concerned about the pain of the purported millions who feel disillusioned, I’m concerned about those with whom Johnston shared friendship and intimate moments mixed liberally with lies and HIV. AA credits spiritual deficits for relapses, Johnston may cite powerlessness because of losing his grip on God’s sanctification. By whatever name, those are smokescreens. A person of integrity, in circumstances like this, will say, “I screwed up. I had better options but did not choose them. I am utterly sorry for the irresponsible decisions I made.”
Maybe some good can come of this, though. Alan Chambers has spoken of his sadness and compassion for Johnston and his partners. Next, it would only make sense for him to promote responsibility and honesty amongst Exodus leaders should they find themselves in worst-case scenarios.
— Steve B.
Steve says: “I accept that Johnston is a man of principle who has a conscience and feels remorse. I accept that the internal conflicts he experienced between his beliefs and actions contributed to his impaired judgement.”
Why? This looks like the classical Elmer Gantry routine. Do what you feel like doing and to hell with everyone else. Need I point out that the whole financing of this comes from the contributors to his ministry?
Besen is going to make this argument very soon. What Johnston did is beyond deplorable. As an out gay man I think gays should pound his worthless ass with large sticks. He is a disgrace. And as long as exgays make excuses for him, as Exodus certainly appears to be doing, the situation demands an outraged voice. Here is my small contribution to that outrage. Michael Johnston is trash. He is filth. He is beneath contempt. He deserves to be thrown into the deepest durance vile available. Outgays, who have been the targets of his outrageous actions, deserve an apology. If not from him, from those who have aided and abetted him. Like Exodus, Falwell etc. Anything less is to license and authorize others to do the same.
The one who is truly beneath contempt is his ‘mother’. She needs to beg the glbtq2s community to forgive her. And then this subhuman slime should slink away, never to be seen or hear by decent folk again.
Dale • 8/6/03; 11:43:59 PM
Following closely on his ‘mother’ should be Regina Griggs (another ‘mother’) and the rest of the anti-gay crowd who have been holding Johnston up as someone to emulate. This is long overdue. One wonders what new scandles will emerge after this one has run its media course.
Dale • 8/6/03; 11:47:36 PM
Dale that’s rough stuff. No human being is trash. Every human being is flawed.
Natalie Davis • 8/7/03; 11:03:51 AM
I was in Lynchburg with SoulForce when Johnston spoke at Falwell’s church, and during the press conference. It was interesting after church, several SoulForce people went to talk with Michael after the service, and some wanted to invite him to lunch. He was surrounded by bodyguards that would not allow anyone from SoulForce to get close to him.
He was a terribly angry person that day. His sermon was carried on Falwell’s TV program. Things just didn’t seem right with him, and now I see why. Falwell and Johnston claimed that they talked with a number of SoulForce people after the service that wanted to become part of their ex-gay ministry – to leave the “homosexual lifestyle.” Mel White, following up on the accusation, contacted all of us from SoulForce asking whether we know of such a thing. As far as I know, the answer was that none of us approached Falwell or Johnston. White challenged Falwell to justify his very public claim, but he would not.
I feel for him and his family. It is never good to see someone fall so hard, but sometimes it is necessary. He was a very angry man in great need. He found the wrong kind of help in Falwell and many within the ex-gay movement.
Bob • 8/7/03; 11:11:07 AM
While I whole heartily disagree with the idea that homosexuality is wrong and I certainly don’t think there is a “cure” for it short of rewiring the brain, I am not sure if a group like exodus can promote safe behavior or should. I think as much responsibility falls on the people that slept with Michael Johnston, as on himself. I do think that knowingly spreading the virus without informing the people you are sleeping with is both unethical and unchristian and that he should not be allowed to be a leader in any Christian movement at the moment.
I think the harm that groups like exodus cause lies in the fact that they deny the reality of being homosexual. In so denying reality many people get hurt. The reality of being homosexual is that you don’t really find members of the opposite gender anywhere near as attractive as members of the same gender. It has nothing to do with wither you have sex with one hundred people or with none. It has nothing to do with wither you go to gay bars, gay bathhouses, star in porn films, cruise rest rooms, or meet the love of your life at the church single’s group. It does mean that if your certainly going to need the help of God to get over being both lonely and sexually unsatisfied if you are not allowed to have a relationship with a member of your own sex lest you go to hell. And, you certianly are not intrested in forming one with the opposite gender or else you would be either bisexual or Hetrosexual. It is not something that on the face of it needs a cure, like addiction to alcohol, gambling, or sex,nor is any cure currently available.
If exodus where to promote things like safe sex and life long monogamy (esp. in the form of marriage), as well as promote things that allow homosexuals to live openly and honestly like non-discrimination laws, and hate crime laws then it would no longer be an ex-gay group. It would be a gay rights group.
jason • 8/7/03; 2:23:39 PM
My kingdom for an edit button! Or, at least an edit box that recognizes and records the space character! here is an easier to read re-post.
While I whole heartily disagree with the idea that homosexuality is wrong and I certainly don’t think there is a “cure” for it short of rewiring the brain, I am not sure if a group like exodus can promote safe behavior or should. I think as much responsibility falls on the people that slept with Michael Johnston, as on himself. I do think that knowingly spreading the virus without informing the people you are sleeping with is both unethical and unchristian and that he should not be allowed to be a leader in any Christian movement at the moment.
I think the harm that groups like exodus cause lies in the fact that they deny the reality of being homosexual. In so denying reality many people get hurt. The reality of being homosexual is that you don’t really find members of the opposite gender anywhere near as attractive as members of the same gender. It has nothing to do with wither you have sex with one hundred people or with none. It has nothing to do with wither you go to gay bars, gay bathhouses, star in porn films, cruise rest rooms, or meet the love of your life at the church single’s group. It does mean that if your certainly going to need the help of God to get over being both lonely and sexually unsatisfied if you are not allowed to have a relationship with a member of your own sex lest you go to hell. It is not something that on the face of it needs a cure, like addiction to alcohol, gambling, or sex.
If exodus where to promote things like safe sex and life long monogamy (esp. in the form of marriage), as well as promote things that allow homosexuals to live openly and honestly like non-discrimination laws, and hate crime laws then it would no longer be an ex-gay group. It would be a gay rights group.
jason • 8/7/03; 2:27:35 PM
Natalie, I use that ‘trash’ word for anyone who is gay etc who indulges in unsafe sex. I especially use it towards those who are positive and yet continue unsafe practices. There are too many dead, too many sick for me to just try to be understanding. The epidemic has been a part of my life for over 20 years now and there is nothing else I can say. I am not real sympathetic to anyone who spreads the disease. And yes, I have been involved in efforts that resulted in people like Johnston being locked away.
Dale • 8/7/03; 7:05:49 PM
Dale, I might have missed the worse of the epidemic since I was a kid when it began to make main stream news. I didn’t have the horrible experience to see the people you love drop like flies but I once got to see first hand the way HIV positive people were stigmatized. In short they were treated like a leper, by folks who were engaging in risky behavior. I don’t agree with his not telling the truth, and I am not certain what you can do to stop people from having unsafe sex, besides education. I am not certain if jailing the guy would be in the best interest of the public, since you don’t want to add more reason for people not to get tested.
I am not sure what was in his head when he did it. He might have wanted to spread it to others, or he might have lead himself to belive he was less danger.
People seem to need sex for more than just lust and often use sex in bad ways. As for him, I would hate to be such a cursed creature. Unable to have a gay relationship, because your beliefs won’t let you. Unable to have a gay relationship because your job and/or status is in danger. Unable to bear with a forced celibacy. Afraid, that if you tell people the truth, people won’t want to have sex with you at all. There is a saying that a whole lot of ugly don’t make pretty. I thank God that I am not in that situation, and I pray to God that anyone in his situation be given the strength to act morally.
From what I read this isn’t a situation where he brought it home to an unsuspecting person, nor is this a case where he had a new girlfriend/boyfriend and did not tell. At best the party go-ers / one night stand-ers knew that exposure was a real possibility and did it anyway. I think this is a situation where everyone hurts, and many people have wounds to bind. A little mercy might turn this horrible thing into something better.
jason • 8/7/03; 9:24:18 PM
Jason:
1. I totally agree about not being able to edit comments. I’d like very much to migrate this blog to a better system when finances and time permit.
2. I believe the Exodus national office and its political allies promote a black-and-white, all-or-nothing approach that jeopardizes the lives of people like Johnston and his sex buddies.
The message I perceive coming from the national office is, either you be fully abstinent AND ideologically in line with the religious right, or you’re going to hell (and until you go to hell, you should be discriminated against and perhaps imprisoned, as discouragement for flouting the ideology).
That sort of absolutism, it seems to me, results in personal isolation and unhealthy binge behavior. Personally, I think if Exodus wishes to be true to conservative Christian values that preserve human life, it should teach moderation with a goal of working toward minimal — and safe — same-gender sexual activity, along with an acknowledgement that some degree of same-gender attraction persists for most ex-gays for a lifetime.
But of course, that compassionate conservative approach would require ditching the ex-gay label and the myth of a homosexual lifestyle. Exodus’ absolutist political ideology does not presently permit such flexibility, compassion, or an acknowledgement of the diversity of same-gender-attracted persons’ lifestyles.
Mike A. • 8/7/03; 10:22:24 PM
Dale, my experience with the issue of AIDS and HIV goes back to the earliest days of the epidemic. I have lost so many friends and loved ones, have held so many hands and bathed so many people dripping with sweat, have even sat and comforted some and held them in my arms as they left this life. Make no mistake, I share your anger over tragic, unspeakably horrible situations such as this. I’m a Christian, an evolving Gandhian, and a humanist, though (and understand and respect that you are not Christian), so I have to think in caring terms even of those with whom I am angriest. Doesn’t make me any less furious, though, and my compassion doesn’t stop me from being sometimes painfully honest. But as I see it, Michael Johnston is in pain too. He has hurt many people (including me), but as Randy Thomas told me, some people believe he has helped them (that is beyond my comprehension, I fear). In any case, however many people he has hurt willfully and unwillfully, he is a human being. I can’t call any human being trash. But Dale, trust me, I understand where you’re coming from, I do.
Natalie Davis • 8/8/03; 11:31:12 AM
Adding to what I said earlier:
If someone like Michael Johnston violates either the expectation for abstinence or the expectation for religious-right conformity, notice what happens:
Peter LaBarbera and Randy Thomas forgive the persistent sexual transgression, provided the individual maintains the religious-right affiliation, as Johnston does.
But if someone (like former Courage UK leader Jeremy Marks or countless U.S. gay Christian leaders) preaches celibacy or sexual restraint, yet leaves the religious-right ideology behind, then they are accused of resuming a lifestyle of promiscuity, disease, and latent pedophilia.
Mike A. • 8/8/03; 7:10:38 PM
Thank you for the kind words Natalie. You and I seem to have had a very similar path to follow. My tradition teaches me that anger is something that I need to experience, that it is the correct response in some situations. And this seems to me to be one of those. MikeA makes some very good points in his latest post. I would agree with him, only in more angry and louder terms. Peace, Dale
Dale • 8/9/03; 10:54:50 AM
Oh, sweet Dale, I can do angry and loud; there is no sin in that. I just can’t be cruel or mean.
I too am angry. After giving the matter thought, I really believe that the people to whom Michael gave a death sentence should press charges against him. I hope they will, because an HIV-positive person who sleeps with people without forewarning them is guilty of at least involuntary manslaughter, in my estimation. Michael deserves our love and compassion because he is a human being, but he deserves to be held accountable too, and not in some fundamentalist Christian retreat. Catholic priests who abused innocent people are going to jail for their transgressions. Why not Michael Johnston?
I am struggling with a way to answer Exodus and Pete LaBarbera, who, post-Exodus’ initial, decent press release, are back to painting all gays in an unfairly negative light. (Kinda like Jerry Falwell during his meeting with Soulforce compared with Jerry Falwell post-his meeting with Soulforce.) Michael addressed it very well on the main page. (Bravo, and thanks, Mike.)
Would it be unfair of me to suggest that both the organization and the fundie pundit are less concerned with real compassion than they are with trying to avoid blame and truthful criticism by positioning themselves as the only voice of “truth”? Mike wrote about the Johnston situation truthfully and compassionately; so did I. Southern Voice, as a newspaper, needs not be compassionate, but it presented the story truthfully. (I wonder if we would have heard the whole story if not for SoVo and Wayne Besen.)
It seems to me that Exodus is interested primarily in winning PR points while attempting to cover up their complicity in putting Michael up on a pedestal for all to see and emulate. I mean, in all honesty, his fall should have been no surprise to anyone who knew him. Michael showed himself quite often to be meanspirited and unkind, even to his colleagues within the ex-gay world. Obviously he showed real meanspiritedness (to say the least) to those he may have infected.
I recall conversations I had with Michael — well, he ranted and I listened — and when I could get a word in edgewise, I could only ask, “Where’s the agape, Michael?” I could ask the same of Alan Chambers and Pete LaBarbera right now.
I am not buying Exodus and LaBarbera’s compassion for those Michael hurt via his extracurricular activities — and let’s not forget those injured by his ministry or his surprise appearance in Lynchburg. If they were, they wouldn’t be trashing homosexuals so maliciously and unjustly. Where is the truth and love for Michael’s victims? Where’s the agape? Does agape go out the window when Exodus has a reputation to save?
I am desperately trying to refrain from being violent in thought or word here. How am I doing, Mike?
Natalie Davis • 8/9/03; 8:46:17 PM
I don’t perceive gloating or violence from you, Natalie.
Overgeneralization? A slight bit — notice that, in response to Johanna and Ron and others, when I now write about Exodus, I try to say “Exodus national office” or refer specifically to Alan Chambers or Randy Thomas. Though if the local ministries or national board members fail to speak up, then I think it’s fair to hold them partly responsible for the misdeeds done by those whom they appoint or hire.
Forgiveness requires accountability, and Johnston has yet to account — even for the events at Lynchburg. So I don’t believe you’re out of line raising Lynchburg. (I’m still waiting for the breaking of bread that Falwell originally promised.)
If others feel the tone of this discussion is unjustifiably harsh, I’m willing to listen.
Mike A. • 8/9/03; 9:58:51 PM
I tried to make clear above that I am speaking of Exodus the organization (meaning the national organization), as opposed to any individuals. Any thought I have about individuals I am — for now, at least — keeping to myself.
Natalie Davis • 8/10/03; 9:13:46 AM
One thing nobody’s said–maybe I’m the only one thinking it–but he constantly talked about what a lonely, sad, depraved, disease-ridden “lifestyle” homosexuality is. Isn’t it amazing, how hard he worked to prove himself right?
I pity everyone he’s lied to. For him, I have none.
Jayelle • 8/11/03; 9:35:11 AM
From the rather vague description of these encounters, it appears Johnston was meeting with people he met online. Probably with the sort of ‘bixexual’ married men who can be found everywhere. Well actually they find you, get propositions all the time. The entire situation here: hotels, anonomity, frequent get togethers sounds like it is outside the normal boundries of the glbt world.
Dale • 8/11/03; 1:28:48 PM
Dale, in my experience these anonymous get togethers in hotels or random people’s apartments are not the least bit outside the glbt world. Not sure where you’re located but here in NYC one only has to pick up the local gay rag to find an anonymous sex party practically any night of the week. One can also find them on the internet easily. For better or worse this practice is not at all unusual as far as I can tell.
Best.
Brett • 8/12/03; 6:36:04 AM
Here in Denver it seems to be a bit different. Haven’t seen the local gay rag in a while, but can not recall any such ads. The invites I get over the internet all stress discretion, married men almost always. Don’t really know what to say, just have a different set of experiences.
Dale • 8/12/03; 9:12:28 AM