At the religious-right’s misnamed “Family Impact Summit,” two spotters for Right Wing Watch recorded their observations of Exodus youth activists Mike Ensley and Scott Davis, and the anti-Christian appeals of Christine Sneeringer, who leads an Exodus-affiliated group called Worthy Creations.
According to the observers:
The session drew attention to efforts by Exodus and others to put a friendly face on its anti-gay message. In response to pro-tolerance and anti-harassment campaigns by pro-equality students, like the Day of Silence, Exodus is promoting a product called “Truth and Tolerance,” (truthandtolerance.net) designed to put anti-gay students on record against bullying (alliestoo.org), and calling for tolerance of students who want to make the case that gay youth need to be straightened out by God.
The session was moderated by Scott Davis from Exodus’ youth division. Davis, a former campus minister, blamed homosexuality on the sexual revolution and broken families, and said that young people are searching for intimacy. He said young people need to be taught a “biblical view of gender” and called on participants to help rescue teens by teaching and modeling “correct” genders, mentoring, and giving them a reason to be pure – a deep intimacy with God. (Some “reparative” therapies work on turning gays straight by making the women wear makeup and use purses, while men play football and learn to fix cars as the first step to becoming “real men.”)
Mike Ensley, also affiliated with the Exodus youth section, called himself a “former homosexual” who “never wanted to be gay.” Ensley said relational ministry has helped him correct his “misperceptions” of gender and that Exodus “rescued” him, though he said change is not a 180 degree turnaround but an “ongoing process.” Ensley, like many other conference speakers, also argued that hate crimes laws are being used to “silence” Christians.
Christine, a young woman who leads Worthy Creations, a “recovery” ministry affiliated with Exodus, said she was homosexual at age 15. She criticized church leaders who don’t want to talk about homosexuality, saying pro-gay “propaganda” is everywhere. Like other conference speakers, Christine said there are new reasons for teens to be involved in homosexuality.
In contrast to “classic lesbianism,” to use Ensley’s terminology, where women who experienced abuse or were taught that men aren’t safe, girls are now becoming lesbians because of a “try it out and see if you like it” mentality. Christine’s message to young women who try it and like it is that their conclusion shouldn’t be that they are gay, but that “everything works” physically: “Even very unhealthy relationships can feel good,” she said, drawing a parallel to some abused children she said experience pleasure from sexual abuse.
Christine argued that there are four types of homosexuals that need to be dealt with:
1. Militant – Christians need to defend against activists without attacking gays.
2. Moderate – gays who are not ‘out and proud;’ Christians should reach out to them as ambassadors for Christ.
3. Repentant – people who are struggling with being gay or “coming out of homosexuality” and attracted to groups like Exodus. Kristine says she is appalled that some Christians don’t offer them more support.
4. Gay and Christian – sincere but part of “the deception” because they are believing a lie.
Despite an open invitation, Exodus has not adequately explained how its 1950s-era lipstick-and-football trivialization of gender is “biblical,” nor has it documented how U.S. federal hate-crime laws are being used to silence anyone besides violent racist felons. Sneeringer’s anti-Christian rhetoric, meanwhile, is a disappointment. In her anti-New-Testament view, advocates for tolerance, justice, and mercy are “militant,” and Christians who reject her political correctness are part of a vast conspiracy known as “the deception.”
Exodus’ war against Christianity saddens me.
In Exodus’ ever charging quest to destroy the English language, “militant” now equals out and proud.
To paraphrase Rebecca West: “I myself have never been able to find out what a militant gay is; I only know that people call me a militant gay whenever I express sentiments that differentiate me from a doormat.”
It’s nice to see that Christine Sneeringer is finally acknowledging that not all lesbian and bi women are butch, at least. It’s discouraging enough when old-guard androgynous lesbians don’t think my long-haired, skirt and makeup-wearing bi self is “woman-loving enough”; it’s worse when ex-gays agree! 🙂
Sorry Mike, but it makes me frikkin angry.
[pause for emphasis…]
And now we’re back:
Wow, what a creepy creepy coincidence that she came up with those “types of homosexuals” all on her own, without even having read Randy Thomas’ chapter in the book “God’s grace and the homosexual next door” (yes, again), entitled “Understanding the Three Degrees of Homosexuality.” Which are labeled as: Repentant, Moderate, and Militant.
I’m sure she
was told aboutcame up with the fourth one, Gay and Christian, right after the ex-gay survivors conference.Also: “…pro-gay “propaganda” is everywhere. Like other conference speakers, Christine said there are new reasons for teens to be involved in homosexuality.”
How’s that for a sales pitch in favor of becoming “involved in” heterosexuality?
Ken R believes that there are four types of ex-gays that need to be dealt with:
1. Militant – Gay Christians need to defend against ex-gay activists without attacking them.
2. Moderate – ex-gays who are not ‘out and proud and into ex-gay activism;’ Gay Christians and their supporters should reach out to them as ambassadors for Christ.
3. Repentant – people who are struggling with being ex-gay or “coming out of ex-gay ministries” and attracted to groups like Evangelicals Concerned, Beyond Ex-Gay or Soulforce. Ken R is proud that many gay/gay supportive Christians offer them support.
4. Ex-Gay and Christian – sincere but part of “the deception” because they are believing a lie that they can make you straight. Or if not, celibate.
[Regarding its frequently used catch-phrase “involved in ___sexuality,”] Exodus refuses to say what it means.
It refuses to use the word “lust” to describe all sexual attraction outside of opposite-gender marriage, and instead it tries to trick the public by 1) misdefining and misusing those highfalutin’ words such as “homosexuality” and “heterosexuality,” and 2) inventing phony “identities.”
When Exodus claims that its programs can change someone’s sexual orientation, they are playing another shell game with words: They quietly redefine “sexual orientation” to mean “behavior in accordance with one’s lusts,” but they refuse to acknowledge this manipulation of language to the public.
Exodus deceives. Sneeringer’s accusation is sheer projection — sheer hypocrisy.
To paraphrase Rebecca West: “I myself have never been able to find out what a militant gay is; I only know that people call me a militant gay whenever I express sentiments that differentiate me from a doormat.”
Personally, I’ve always used these definitions:
Militant Homosexual: A homosexual who thinks there’s nothing wrong with being a homosexual.
Militant Homosexual Activist: A homosexual acting like they they don’t think there’s anything wrong with being a homosexual.
As near as I can tell, this is what’s usually meant by these terms.
Homosexuals described as being “Moderate” are actually closeted gays. How is being proud of who you are -meaning, not afraid to express that you love people of the same sex, should the proper context set in – being “militant?” There’s only two types of gays for people at Exodus: either you are ashamed of yourself, or you are proud and therefore are pushing yourself and your beliefs on everybody else. I can’t decide which gay I am because I’ve never done either.
In essence, the only acceptable gays really are those who are too afraid to show their love.
I don’t call this a war on Christianity, I call this a war on LOVE.
Tripe.
Lynn David,
Can you be a bit more specific?
Since this is XGW I understand the purpose of your lives is to ridicule and make fun of those who make a choice for their life that doesn’t align itself with LOGO, MTV or Oprah. I can see you’re trying to warn people of potential places and therapies that are crazy. That’s admirable but only if you didn’t share the belief that sexual orientation is fixed and should never try and be changed even if the person stuck in that life hates it. Sounds to me imposing your brand of happiness aims to hurt not help. (There is NO SCIENTIFIC FACTS ON HOMOSEXUALITY BEING GENETIC) When I share how happy I am because I got away from the gay life you speak of and all I have to say is good things it really grinds XGW’s gears. All you can say to defend your view is “I bet you’re pretending to be happy or if you have 1 single gay thought in your life ever then we proved you haven’t changed.” With that mindset alcoholics should never stop drinking because someday they will have a thought about having a drink proving that AA is meaningless and wrong and will never ever work for anyone ever.
It’s XGW who falsely state that the point of Exodus is there to make gay people straight. In all my time around such ministries not once have I heard such a thing. Maybe the more hardcore catholic or whatever groups are like that but my time with Exodus ministries MADE NO SUCH CLAIM! No one wants to believe that I would stay away and I Don’t miss a single thing about gay life. You forget what makes most real Christians happy isn’t being right or pretending we are still in the 1950’s era-IT’S SERVING A LOVING GOD OPENLY WITHOUT FEAR OR QUESTION.
No one here can say anything like that about gay life-gay life serves nothing but itself-The proof is in the pride.
I’m very glad you are happy and I hope you stay that way – a rare thing for anyone. However, I hope that as you grow in your faith you might learn to be a little less judgmental and a little more civil when speaking to people you know nothing about. And check that anger, too.
Now if you decide to post again, please be civil and germane.
Oh, and I never watch MTV or Oprah, but I do like Logo now and then.
I don’t like Logo, MTV or Oprah; I like Battlestar Galactica, La Femme Nikita, Top Chef, and Ugly Betty: programs that, unlike the Family Impact Summit, promote family and community values, human rights, and the weighing of difficult moral questions.
Like David, however, I’m glad that some ex-gays are happy — provided that they don’t try to impose political correctness and religious intolerance upon others.
Interesting – is that supposed to be an anti-Catholic screed as well? FYI, “watcher,” the Catholic group Courage actually does not even hold out the false hope of heterosexuality – they simply work to keep people celibate.
More importantly, the post was not about “ex-gays,” but rather about the way certain religious fundamentalists refuse to accept that there are gay and lesbian people who not only like their lives, but also reject certain religions that hold themselves as holier-than-thou.
XGW Watcher….if you believe that television network programs are all that informs gays and lesbians or straight people about homosexuals, that just shows the limits of what you know or what can be known about gay people simply from extensive experience. Entertainment venues are just that, entertainment. The more serious forums that gay people participate in, such AS exgaywatch, or Independent gay forum or even the LOGO interviews of the Democratic candidates showed the LGBT community for what it really is in it’s diversity and agenda.
That forum featured soldiers, educators, AIDS advocates, actors, writers, journalists and rock stars, city managers and peace officers and educators….
these ARE backgrounds to be proud of.
If YOU’RE so happy as a now straight person…why does this come at the expense of gay people?
Whom the public is still VERY ignorant about and will continue to be if those in the ex gay business keep getting in the way of the public being truly educated and given the opportunity to choose social integration with gay people as they ARE. Not what the ex gay business wishes they were.
Honesty, transparency and forming a trusting environment are the first casualties of the ex gay industry.
News flash ex gay watcher: There is no heterosexual gene either. And one’s genetic makeup hasn’t been protection from casual violence and discrimination (I am a black woman, so I know all about that.)
There simply is no gene to determine sexual orientation for ANYONE, so you don’t have the luxury of deciding that’s the evidence owed. As IF that would make a difference to a society determined to create a scapegoat.
I’m a heterosexual, and I can tell you right now, it’s no magic bullet regarding relationships, sex or anything else in the complex realm of romantic relationships. The worst folly is straight people thinking the only way to curing homosexuality is enough prayer, sex with an opposite sex heterosexual and having no more rights than a child in society at large.
If you’re so happy, go be happy. Why do you have to convince by attacking gay people and exgaywatch? So you’re hetero now, so what?
So am I. Big deal.
I can hardly wait to see how Rev. Harry Jackson reports on this on his column in TownHall.
Regan, the guy has already been banned – he had been banned before but came back with multiple identities. There is no need to call attention to that garbage, especially since he can’t even respond.
Someone help me with adding to my understanding, per Proverbs 9:9:
Is the challenge/weakness with the original 4 labels and their semantics? Or, is the problem with the definitions? Or, are folks saying that 4 categories are insufficient in number and wish more categories? Or, are people saying that the ‘Christian response’ offered/implied in the definitions is non-Biblical (or is according to the Law but not according to the Life of Christ)? Or?….
In other words, pretending that we are fellow professors reviewing her thesis, what advice would we then offer?
Thanks for the help on this one; Caryn
Caryn, good question — Thank you for seeking clarification.
I hope commenters will offer their perspectives on exactly what’s wrong with those labels.